I. Link to Dr.SHIVA’s Historic 2020 Lawsuit Discovery of the TWITTER Portal for Government to SILENCE POLITICAL SPEECH

II. Dr.SHIVA’s Latest Lawsuit Against the U.S. Government: CISA/DHS

Updated on November 17, 2022

III. The Intercept “DHS Leaks” is PLAGIARISM, Manipulation & Hijacking by the Intercept of Dr. SHIVA’s Work in Order to INTENTIONALLY CONCEAL Intercept Boss Pierre Omidyar’s Role in Creating the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure That Dr. SHIVA Discovered TWO YEARS AGO in His Historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit Ayyadurai v. Twitter, et al

Updated on November 5, 2022

“It’s easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled.” – Mark Twain

Will Elon Musk Do ANYTHING to Dismantle the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Discovered by Dr. SHIVA in His Historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit?

This Diagram and All The Evidence Related to It Has Been Available on This Web Site for Well Over Two Years

Diagram Low Res & High Res

Dr. SHIVA Issued a Communication to Elon Musk on October 30, 2022 Concerning His 2020 Discovery of the Censorship Infrastructure. The NEXT DAY, the Intercept Reacted and Rapidly Dropped their “DHS Leaks” Dribble to Deceive the Public.

On October 28, 2022, Elon Musk announces he completed sale of Twitter.

On October 30, 2022, Dr. SHIVA alerts Elon Musk to the existence of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure (Twitter Partner Support Portal) Involving Pierre Omidyar.

On October 31, 2022, Omidyar’s Intercept drops their “DHS Leaks” plagiarized dribble.

The Intercept “DHS Leaks” is NOTHING NEW But BLATANT PLAGIARISM of Dr. SHIVA’s Work That Has Been Available on This Web Site for Over TWO YEARS. The Aim of Omidyar’s Recent Efforts is to INTENTIONALLY CONCEAL that Pierre Omidyar, Intercept’s Founder and Funder, is the SAME PERSON Who Funded the Creation of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Discovered by Dr. SHIVA in His Historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit Ayyadurai v. Twitter, et al

The Intercept’s Pierre Omidyar is not only the funder and a founder of the Intercept, but ALSO, the SAME PERSON who funded the creation of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure discovered by Dr. SHIVA over two years ago based on his findings from his historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit. Those findings and source material were published on this website, and have been here for well over two years.

“DHS Leaks” is a Purposeful Dribble – a “Limited” Version of Dr. SHIVA’s Work – to Deceive People into Believing they Have Gotten the “Truth” When In Fact it is a Cover Up to Conceal the Larger Truth Which is Far More Damaging

Any true Investigative Journalist reviewing the diagram and documents that have been on our site for over TWO YEARS will observe that it was Pierre Omidyar – the funder and founder of the Intercept itself – who also funded The Center for Internet Security to create and house the infrastructure (EISAC) to launder censorship from government to Big Tech. How convenient that Omidyar owns the Intercept – which is branded as some incredible rag committed to “aggressive and adversarial journalism” – so he may use it at will to cover up (through a “Limited Hangout”) his “conflicts of interest.”

The Intercept “DHS Leaks” is a Cover Up Known in Intelligence Circles as a “Limited Hangout” – Designed to Give the Public a “Limited” Version of Actual Events to Serve as a Pressure Valve Designed to Relieve Interest Without Damaging the Larger System

In this current situation, Omidyar’s proxies at the Intercept – Fang and Klippenstein – did a “Limited Hangout” to conceal Omidyar’s involvement in creating the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure that Dr.SHIVA discovered during his historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit – the details of which have been up on this website for over TWO YEARS. Fang and Klippenstein are employees of the Intercept – the same organization that Omidyar funded and founded.

In order to appreciate the insidious nature of the Intercept’s “DHS Leaks” news story’s deception, one must understand the concept of the “Limited Hangout.” It was only recently that Dr. SHIVA came to appreciate this terminology.

A few days ago, Dr. SHIVA was commenting to colleagues that there must be a word to describe the process when someone appropriates portions of original source work, but only releases a piece of it to manipulate lots of people to thinking the whole truth was shared, when in fact that sharing of a pale version of the original source was to conceal a critical element in the original source. He was very fortunate that someone he met fortuitously a few days ago said, “Oh, that’s known as a Limited Hangout, a powerful technique used by the Intelligence agencies.”

What Is A “Limited Hangout”

A bit of online Googling led Dr. SHIVA to an article written by David Brown at ClearanceJobs (Source: https://news.clearancejobs.com/2014/02/23/a-limited-hangout-allow-spies-to-tell-one-truth-to-hide-another/) which provides a wonderful definition and description  of Limited Hangout. Brown states:

There is a term of art in politics and among intelligence professionals that is known as the “limited hangout.” Whenever one’s veil of secrecy is penetrated, spies or politicians can employ misdirection to distract the public. The technique involves disclosing a self-contained and sensational but relatively benign story to overshadow something more damaging. It’s a non-confession, with the agency or individual seeming to “lay all the cards on the table,” and assuage concerns that anyone is trying to hide anything. Upon learning the “truth” as presented, the public is mollified and moves on with no real scrutiny of note, missing the real story altogether.

It’s a kind of public relations pressure valve designed to relieve interest without damaging the larger system. The phrase was popularized during the Watergate scandal, when President Nixon and senior White House officials were recorded having used the term while discussing the merits of releasing manicured details about the burglary. They would acknowledge certain events and withhold others with the effect of clearing the president of any wrongdoing.

This concept of “Limited Hangout” is an incredible innovation. It provides government and those in power to manipulate the masses – the citizens – into thinking they are living in “democracy” and getting truths by their “investigative journalists,” when in fact they are being misdirected and as Brown says “mollified.”

The Key Steps Used by the Intercept and their Colleagues in Executing the Limited Hangout on Dr. Shiva’s 2020 Lawsuit Findings

Concealing, Plagiarism, Misattribution, and Prevarication & Manipulation by the Intercept to Hijack the REAL TRUTH of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Discovered by Dr. SHIVA Two Years Ago in his 2020 Historic Federal Lawsuit .

In this present situation, Omidyar’s Intercept – which is nothing but a government actor, as we will reveal – is serving execute a Limited Hangout to conceal the bigger truth of THEIR Boss Pierre Omidyar’s involvement in the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure they speak about and have plagiarized from our 2020 lawsuit.  

The “LIMITED HANGOUT” PROCESS

However, the two proxies at Omidyar’s Intercept, have purposefully left out Omidyar’s involvement.  This is “manicuring” the detail of the Censorship Infrastructure that was done to clear their boss Pierre Omidyar of having any wrongdoing in creating the infrastructure.  Quite clever – insidious to be more accurate.

This process of executing the limited hangout required the following key steps:

1. CONCEAL Dr. SHIVA’s Findings from his historic 2020 federal lawsuit;

2. PLAGIARIZE Dr. SHIVA’s Findings from his historic 2020 federal lawsuit;

3. MISATTRIBUTE Dr. SHIVA’s Findings from his historic 2020 federal lawsuit to others so as to bury the true origin;
4. PREVARICATE & MANIPULATE Dr. SHIVA’s Findings from his historic 2020 federal lawsuit to hide critical elements to conceal.
5. HIJACK Dr. Shiva’s Findings from his historic 2020 federal lawsuit to now “own” the content so as to release “half-truth”; and,
6. AMPLIFY their “half-truth” using the same folks who CONCEALED Dr. SHIVA’s Findings from his historic 2020 federal lawsuit.

The flunkies at Omidyar’s Intercept executed this Limited Hangout to censor Dr. SHIVA’s work and to conceal the involvement of Pierre Omidyar in the creation of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure discovered by Dr. SHIVA two years ago in his 2020 historic Federal Lawsuit. They executed concealment, plagiarism, misattribution, prevarication & manipulation, hijacking and amplification of their “half-truth.”

Quite unfortunate – for them, that we figured this out.

Well, “investigative journalists” are supposed to be sleuths, doing detailed research, and are supposed to dig, and dig for the truth.  If over 200 million people knew about Dr. Shiva’s findings, why did they not know?  Did they not know how to use Google?  Did they not see the articles on Dr. Shiva’s lawsuit going viral all over the Internet?

Omidyar’s Intercept Executed Their Limited Hangout The Day After Dr.SHIVA reached out to Elon Must to Communicate the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Involving Pierre Omidyar He Had Discovered in His 2020 Historic Federal Lawsuit

On October 28, 2022, Elon Musk announces he completed sale of Twitter.

On October 30, 2022, Dr. SHIVA alerts Elon Musk to the existence of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure (Twitter Partner Support Portal) Involving Pierre Omidyar.

On October 31, 2022, Omidyar’s Intercept drops their “DHS Leaks” plagiarized dribble.

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, MIT PhD, the Inventor of Email, Was the First to Expose to Over 200 Million People the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure He Discovered During His Historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit Ayyadurai v. Twitter, Et Al. – The Documentation of Which Has Been Accessible on This Website for Over Two Years

The Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Discovered by Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai in His 2020 Historic Lawsuit Over Two Years Ago

Diagram Low Res & High Res

The above systems diagram of the Government & Big-Tech Censorship Infrastructure – with detailed references for each link – was created and submitted into the court record in Dr. SHIVA’s historic federal lawsuit – by integrating information from thousands of pages of source material that Dr. SHIVA discovered in the course of his lawsuit. This diagram lays out in detail the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure that enables government to launder censorship by “fill[ing] in the gap” so it may censor, silence, and deplatform individuals that the government . It is this infrastructure that was used to silence Dr. SHIVA during his run for U.S. Senate in the Republican Primary in September of 2020.

As Dr. SHIVA’s lawsuit states with clarity – up front in the preamble – (which Fang and Klippenstein clearly plagiarized – see in sections below):

Starting in October 2017, government officials concluded that though the nature of U.S. elections was decentralized – spread across 10,000 jurisdictions and using  different kinds of machines (and diverse methods: paper and electronic) – was the best  defense to cyberhacking, they needed to eliminate such decentralization because it was a  hindrance to their desire to establish and use a centralized infrastructure with non-governmental entities to “fill the gap” between domestic government agencies who had no  power to curtail speech, and federal intelligence agencies who were forbidden from  curtailing domestic speech, in order to censor speech by surveilling, blacklisting, and  silencing U.S. citizens, domestically, and thus allow government officials to violate the First Amendment without fear of being sued. 

As Dr. SHIVA’s lawsuit detailed, the desire of government to “fill in the gap” required folks like Pierre Omidyar to fund the NGO, Center for Internet Security that housed EISAC to serve as the vehicle to launder censorship from Government to Social Media companies such as Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.  All of this detailed in Dr. SHIVA’s lawsuit and source materials such as the Playbooks which were read into the record.

Omidyar’s Intercept and its colleagues such as Tucker Carlson, Glenn Greenwald, organizations such as the A.C.L.U. claiming to fight for the First Amendment, and other high-profile Internet Grifters purposely CONCEALED Dr. SHIVA’s work.

The Intercept “DHS Leaks” is Neither New Nor a “Breaking Story” But an Insidious and Conscious Interception – Concealing, Plagiarizing, Misattributing, Prevaricating and Manipulating – of Dr. SHIVA’s Original Work from His Historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit In Order: 1) to Conceal the Guilt of Intercept Founder & Funder Pierre Omidyar, Who Funded the Creation of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Discovered by Dr. SHIVA; and, 2) to Conceal the Full Extent of the Network of Organizations – Beyond Just the DHS – that Continue to Be Involved in Perpetuating this Censorship Infrastructure

The Intercept’s “DHS Leaks” story is an interception – concealing, plagiarizing, misattributing, manipulating and prevaricating – the findings from Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai’s (“Dr. SHIVA”) 2020 historic federal lawsuit Ayyadurai v. Twitter, Et Al. The intention of this effort by Omidyar’s Intercept was for this to serve as a “Limited Hangout” to conceal Pierre Omidyar’s – Intercept’s funder and founder’s – involvement in the funding and creation of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure discovered by Dr. SHIVA in his historic federal lawsuit over two years ago.

The crooked flunkies Fang & Klippenstein posing as “Investigative Journalists,” however, have a big problem in executing their BIG LIE of the originality of their work given over 200 million people worldwide already knew of Dr. Shiva’s historic findings of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure since Dr. SHIVA published hundreds of videos and blog and delivered many lectures and symposiums sharing his findings, which have been available on this site for over two years.

In fact, Tucker Carlson, Glenn Greenwald, A.C.L.U, and Internet grifters, now reporting and amplifying Intercept’s deception and cover up, were fully aware of Dr. Shiva’s findings. While independent real journalists during 2020-2021 shared Dr. SHIVA’s original and historic discoveries, the mainstream media and not-so-obvious-establishment journalists purposefully concealed the findings to protect government and its actors.

The Intercept “DHS Leaks” is nothing but the latest effort of the Government and its proxies to bury Dr. SHIVA’s findings. Within moments of Dr. SHIVA reaching out to Elon Musk on social media (following Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter) to share with Elon Musk the Government & Big Tech Censorship infrastructure that Dr. SHIVA had discovered, that is still in place at Twitter and other social media companies, the Intercept then dropped their not-so “breaking” story.

The question is:

Does Elon Musk Know that Pierre Omidyar Funded the Creation of the Government and Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Discovered by Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Over 2 Years Ago in His Historic 202 Federal Lawsuit That is Still in Place at Twitter and Every Social Media Company?

Intercept’s “Investigative Journalists” – proxies for Pierre Omidyar – in alliance with mainstream media colleagues purposefully & consciously concealed, plagiarized, misattributed, manipulated & prevaricated the original work and discoveries of Dr. SHIVA’s findings in order to hijack Dr. SHIVA’s work to distract & Dissuade people from the real depth of the Censorship and Deception uncovered by Dr. SHIVA OVER TWO YEARS AGO

Over 200 Million People Knew About Dr. SHIVA’s Findings of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Discovered by Dr. Shiva Over 2 Years Ago in His Historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit

The Government and mainstream media have been working hard – and Failing Miserably for the Past Two Years – to conceal Dr. Shiva’s discovery of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure from His Historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit.

Now, these same folks – who concealed Dr. SHIVA’s lawsuit – through their mainstream media channels, believe they can hijack Dr. SHIVA’s work so as to manipulate the public to make themselves the source of Dr. SHIVA’s findings, release limited information, mollify people with the illusion that they now have gotten the whole story, and move on.  

However, they have a BIG PROBLEM in executing their BIG LIE that they were the ones who broke this story,  given over 200 million people already heard about this story through the hundreds of videos, blogs, lectures and symposia, delivered by Dr. SHIVA over the past two years, and through the nearly 360,000+ people in over 95 countries who are part of the Truth Freedom Health® Movement that is mobilizing citizens across the world to share the real truth and expose the Not-So-Obvious-Establishment like Omidyar’s Intercept.

Here is a small sample of those videos, blogs, etc.  not including all the views across social media, and coverage by independent and real investigative journalists:

10/1/20	Dr.SHIVA LIVE: State of MA Orders Twitter to SHUTDOWN Dr.SHIVA for Exposing #ElectionFraud
10/6/20	Dr.SHIVA LIVE: You Criticize the State. State Calls Twitter and Shuts You Down.
10/21/20	Interview on WMSN – $1.2Billion First Amendment Lawsuit on MA Secretary of State
10/30/20	Dr.SHIVA Obtains Landmark Victory For Political Speech on Twitter
11/30/20	Dr.SHIVA #OnePersonOneVote Lawsuit: Celebrate & Support (vashiva.com)- BLOG POST
2/3/21	Dr.SHIVA LIVE: State of MA Has Twitter Ban Dr.SHIVA for Exposing Violation of Federal Law
2/3/21	#BringBackDrSHIVA on TWITTER: MA Sec. of State Obstructs Justice by Making Twitter Suspend Dr.SHIVA for Exposing Violation of Federal Law
2/4/21	Dr.SHIVA LIVE: Who Threw Me Off Twitter? And, Why. Cat’s Paw Liability in the 21st Century.
2/5/21	Dr.SHIVA LIVE: Local & Global Media Cover Government of MA Shutting Down Speech on Twitter
3/14/21	ANOTHER Victory for Dr.SHIVA’S Historic First Amendment Federal Lawsuit
5/6/21	Truth Freedom Health Moms Prove Votes Don’t Add Up in Historic One Person One Vote Lawsuit
5/14/21	Federal Judge Orders Twitter to Testify in Court in Historic First Amendment Lawsuit
5/15/21	Dr.SHIVA’s Historic First Amendment Lawsuit to Win Back Freedom: First Case in U.S. To Show Government MADE Twitter Silence Political Speech
5/20/21	How Government & Twitter Act As ONE to Silence Speech
5/23/21	The Lawsuit Against Government & Twitter That Big Media Will Never Cover
6/2/21	Historic Lawsuit Exposes How Government Launders Censorship Through Twitter
6/2/21	Dr.SHIVA Reveals To Steve Bannon How The State Tells Twitter Who To Silence
6/2/21	TWITTER’s Backdoor Enables Government to SHUTDOWN Political Speech.
6/2/21	Historic Lawsuit Exposes How Government Launders Censorship Through Twitter
6/2/21	How Elites in US & India Launder Censorship from Boston to Bombay thru #BigTech
6/3/21	Where Government Ends and Twitter Begins NOBODY Knows. The Establishment is ONE!
6/6/21	Dr.SHIVA LIVE Q&A at Red Pill Expo
6/6/21	Red Pill Expo 2021 Keynote Speech.
6/6/21	Dr.SHIVA LIVE with Patriot Soapbox at RedPill Expo 2021
7/21/21	MIT PhD Lawsuit FIRST to Uncover U.S. Government Censorship SYSTEM to Silence Speech
7/27/21	MIT PhD Lawsuit FIRST to Uncover U.S. Government Censorship SYSTEM to Silence Speech
8/4/21	Defendants NOW Demand SILENCING Dr.SHIVA’s First Amendment Lawsuit. Hearing Tomorrow.
8/13/21	Dr.Shiva at Mike Lindell’s Cyber Symposium reveals how BigTech is really GOVERNMENT Tech
8/18/21	Steve Bannon Interviews Dr.SHIVA at Mike Lindell’s Cyber Symposium.

To reiterate, the “DHS Leaks” story is an interception – a plagiarizing, misattribution, prevarication, and  manipulation – of the findings from Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai’s (“Dr. SHIVA”) 2020 historic federal lawsuit Ayyadurai v. Twitter, Et Al to serve as a “Limited Hangout” to conceal Pierre Omidyar’s –  Intercept’s funder and founder’s – involvement in the funding and creation of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure discovered in Dr. SHIVA in his lawsuit over two years ago, and now a limited hangout version of it being reported by the Intercept.

The crooked Intercept flunkies Fang & Klippenstein posing as “Investigative Journalists,” however, have a big problem in executing their big lie of the originality of their work given over 200 million people worldwide already knew of Dr. Shiva’s historic findings of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure since Dr. SHIVA published hundreds of videos and blog and delivered many lectures and symposiums sharing his findings, as shown above

Tucker Carlson, Glenn Greenwald, A.C.L.U, and Internet grifters, have a big problem.  They are now reporting and amplifying the Intercept’s deception and cover up. They were fully aware of Dr. SHIVA’s findings. They cannot now deny that there were personally informed and chose to be a part of the cover up.

Credit should be given to the real independent journalists during 2020-2021 shared Dr. Shiva’s discoveries, the mainstream media and not-so-obvious-establishment journalists purposefully concealed the findings to protect government and its actors.

Real Journalists Were Deplatformed and Called “Conspiracy Theorists” While the Intercept and their Colleagues Proliferate “Half Truths” to Conceal Pierre Omidyar’s Involvement in the Creation & Funding of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Discovered by Dr. SHIVA

Since 2020, while Dr. SHIVA and other real independent investigative journalists like Gateway Pundit and real activists in the Truth Freedom Health® Movement were deplatformed and called “Conspiracy Theorists,” Omidyar’s Intercept, Tucker Carlson, Glenn Greenwald were presented as “Investigative Journalists” and enjoyed access to all social media platforms, while concealing the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure discovered by Dr. SHIVA.

The Intercept Intentionally Buried Dr. Shiva’s Work to Conceal Pierre Omdiyar’s Involvement in the Creation of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Discovered By Dr. SHIVA Over 2 Years Ago in His Historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit

Did The Intercept & their Colleagues Intentionally Conceal Dr. Shiva’s Findings from Dr. SHIVA’s 2020 Historic Federal Lawsuit when Over 200 Million Knew About It? Was this Just Incompetence?

Anyone reading this may want play “Devil’s Advocate” so as to excuse the Intercept and its colleagues under the framework that “They didn’t know.”

This is hard to resolve given these folks are supposed to be “investigative journalist.” Thousands attended Dr. SHIVA’s lawsuits on Zoom; and, over 200 million people viewed his videos, and blogs, as well as the other reporting by independent journalists.

Given Dr. SHIVA’s discovery of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure is perhaps one of the most important discoveries of our time, the truth is the chance of the Intercept not knowing is near 0%.

Moreover, Dr. Shiva actually notified Tucker Carlson, and Glenn Greenwald – the individuals who concealed Dr. SHIVA’s work and amplified the Intercept’s half-truths.   

The conclusion: the Intercept did conceal it.

PIERRE OMIDYAR Is An Asset of Government Intelligence Who Also Created the Intercept to Conceal His Involvement in His Imperialist and Censorship Activities

Any true Investigative Journalist reading the diagram and documents that have been on our site for over TWO YEARS can see that it was Pierre Omidyar who funded and created the infrastructure to launder censorship for government to Big Tech. How convenient that Omidyar can also own the Intercept – branded as some incredible rag committed to “aggressive and adversarial journalism” – and use it to do damage control i.e., Limited Hangout so his cover is not broken.

A review of the facts from our lawsuit will reveal that Pierre Omidyar is an Intelligence Asset. He was fully involved in creating the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure.  To conceal this fact is the aim of the DHS Leaks – to serve as a “Limited Hangout.”

Some basic research will also reveal the extent of Omidyar’s influence and network.

For example, Alexander Rubinstein and Max Blumenthal / MintPress News report in their February 20, 2019 article, “ “How tech oligarch Pierre Omidyar funds regime-change networks and partners with CIA cutouts,” we find:

• Pierre Omidyar – billionaire eBay founder; bankrolls massive network of regime-change organizations, which work closely with CIA cutouts like USAID and the NED
• Partnered closely with many U.S.-funded outfits that fulfill the role the CIA used to play during the Cold War, supporting opposition media and civil society in countries targeted for regime change
• Client of Frontier Design Group – U.S. government national security consulting firm; Omidyar Group was a client; Arlington, Virginia-based company focused on design solutions for national security problems; furnished reports for USAID’s Global Development Lab in February 2018; other clients include Council on Foreign Relations and U.S. Army Special Forces
• Karen Grattan — a senior advisor at Frontier Design Group; founder and CEO of Engaging Inquiry, a Fairfax, Virginia-based firm that has enjoyed the Omidyar Group as a client since 2015. Also on its client roster are Omidyar’s Democracy Fund and Humanity United, as well as USAID and the Department of Defense.
• Omidyar himself is named in the documents; the billionaire had apparently directed finances from his Omidyar Network Fund LLC into an “Offgrid Electric Ltd” in Seychelles – an island that the ICIJ itself called “a haven for dirty money.”
• When ICIJ began disseminating its files to the media, activities like those of its major funders were overlooked. HERE IS YOUR LIMITED HANGOUT
• Omidyar Network contributed one million dollars to help establish an International Fact-Checking Network through Poynter in 2017, with objective “to increase [Poynter’s] work as the premier advocate, convener and trainer of fact-checkers worldwide.” 
• In announcing Omidyar’s investment in the digital media site, Rappler touted its one-of-a-kind and arguably extremely creepy business model.
  • Using a patented user engagement model and a community mapping data analytics tool, Rappler tracks how stories and emotions move through its community. It starts with a mood meter on every story, an effort to capture non-rational reactions.
  • Developed with psychologists and sociologists, the mood meter is based on research that shows up to 80% of how people make decisions in their lives is not about what they think but how they feel.
    • This kind of multi-level approach — combining a journalism startup on the front-end with a behavior profiling risk management system on the back-end — is very much inline with Omidyar’s vision for how to use technology to manage society — and make money in the process.
  • Central to most of his investments is the use of user profiling and behavioral tracking to manage and run all areas of modern life: journalism, transportation, banking and finance, and government administration. To him it’s not just about running a single service, but integrating things together to give technocrats, business executives and government officials a God’s-eye view of the world — to manage and control society more efficiently.”
• Omidyar’s wish to spark “bigger” social movements is not confined to the Philippines, nor to the world of media either. His Omidyar Network coordinates openly with U.S. State Department and intelligence cut-outs, acting as a private fund arm, much like the Ford Foundation did during the Cold War. Across the globe, he is creating new opportunities for himself by assisting the U.S. drive for regime change under cover of “democracy promotion.”
• At the 2011 Clinton Global Initiative event, Omidyar’s Humanity United announced a partnership with Richard Branson’s Virgin Unite called “Enterprise Zimbabwe.” The initiative aimed to “catalyse investments from philanthropic and commercial donors to fund small and medium-size businesses and social development initiatives.” Today, the website for the initiative is inaccessible and Virgin has also scrubbed its page on it.
• Over the years, Omidyar has invested alongside the NED as well as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in strategic locations around the globe. In fact, the NED’s media arm, the Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA), lists the Omidyar Network as a partner organization that is “tackl[ing] the root causes of the global trust deficit” in mainstream media.
• In 2012, the State Department’s USAID pumped money into a network of Ukrainian NGOs called Center UA, contributing over half of its budget. Most of the remaining funding these NGOs received was from Omidyar, who delivered nearly $200,000 in 2012.
• Just a year earlier, Omidyar invested $335,000 into Center UA, claiming the donation was merely designed “to amplify the voices of Ukrainian citizens.” The group is affiliated with Oleh Rybachuk, one of the main architects of Ukraine’s so-called Orange Revolution, which swung the government in support of the West in 2004. In 2014, this group “played a big role in getting the [Maidan] protest up and running,” according to the Financial Times. Just a year earlier, Omidyar’s investments in the outfit surpassed a million dollars in total.
• In the months leading up to Euromaidan, Omidyar partnered with the U.S. Embassy in Kiev to found Hromadske, a Ukrainian broadcast news channel that carried the message of regime change day after day. Recently, Hromadske hosted a radio program that formed part of the Omidyar-funded International Fact-Checking Network.
• Omidyar appears to have links of his own to the proxy war on Syria: a director of Omidyar Network, Amy Regas – in charge of the group’s decidedly neoliberal “property rights” campaign – is the former director of a notoriously opaque private aid and development firm called Chemonics.
• What’s more, Omidyar has contributed heavily to an organization called News Deeply. Founded by a former McKinsey consultant named Lara Setrakian, the $2.5 million media operation is the publishing parent of Syria Deeply, an outlet that features commentary and analysis from an almost uniformly pro-opposition perspective, including by the directors of the USAID-funded Syrian American Medical Society.

The A.C.L.U. Intentionally CONCEALED Dr. SHIVA’s Discovery of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Revealed in Dr. SHIVA’s 2020 Historic Federal Lawsuit. The A.C.L.U., however, TWO YEARS LATER in 2022 DID Share and Amplify the Intercept’s Plagiarized Dribble of Dr. SHIVA’s Work

Pierre Omidyar Has Contributed Millions to the ACLU!

At the time, given Dr. SHIVA running for office as a Republican, he was shocked why the A.C.L.U. would not do anything, not even one re-sharing of his findings that exposed a total violation of the First Amendment.  Dr. SHIVA’s counsel – member of the A.C.L.U. – told him, “they know about your lawsuit, but the A.C.L.U. has become highly politicized, and they will never cover it.”

Later, this same person sent Dr. SHIVA this article in the NY Times that states that if you are not a “progressive,” then the A.C.L.U. would look the other way.  

However, the A.C.L.U. jumped to share the Intercept’s “DHS Leaks” dribble plagiarzied from Dr. SHIVA. Pierre Omidyar, the Intercept’s funder and funder, has donated millions to the A.C.L.U. The “DHS Leaks” was a cover up – a Limited Hangout – to conceal Omidyar’s involvement in the funding and creation of the Government and Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure discovered by Dr. SHIVA during his historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit.

Tucker Carlson Intentionally CONCEALED Dr. SHIVA’s Discovery of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Revealed in Dr. SHIVA’s 2020 Historic Federal Lawsuit. Tucker Carlson, however, TWO YEARS LATER in 2022 DID Share and Amplify the Intercept’s Plagiarized Dribble of Dr. SHIVA’s Work

Here are email communications from Dr. SHIVA to Tucker Carlson clearly sharing the findings form 2020-2021. Tucker Carlson was FULLY AWARE of Dr. SHIVA’s findings and purposefully CONCEALED THEM.

Tucker Carlson in 10/20/2022

Here is an email sent to Tucker right after October 30. 2022 and Tucker Did Nothing.

Here is another email of a press release, Tucker did nothing:

TWO YEARS LATER, Tucker Carlson supported the dissemination of the “DHS Leaks” – the Intercept’s cover up – “Limited Hangout” – by now acting like Mikey the DUNCE by stating, “This seems like a really important story, which for some reason is being ignored.”

Tucker Carlson is lying in your face and to his entire audience when he states in his interview with the flunky Fang: “This seems like a really important story, which for some reason being ignored.”  

Yes, Tucker Carlson, YOU “ignored” – CONCEALED – the story.

Glenn Greenwald Intentionally CONCEALED Dr. SHIVA’s Discovery of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Revealed in Dr. SHIVA’s 2020 Historic Federal Lawsuit. Glenn Greenwald, however, TWO YEARS LATER in 2022 DID Share and Amplify the Intercept’s Plagiarized Dribble of Dr. SHIVA’s Work

Glenn Greenwald CANNOT DENY That He was Personally Informed TWO YEARS AGO.

Here are email communications from Dr. SHIVA to Glenn Greenwald clearly sharing the findings form 2020-2021. Glenn Greenwald was FULLY AWARE of Dr. SHIVA’s findings and purposefully CONCEALED THEM.

TWO YEARS LATER, Glenn Greenwald supported the dissemination of the “DHS Leaks” – the Intercept’s cover up – “Limited Hangout” – but purposefully CONCEALED for over TWO YEARS the “crucial evidence” Dr. SHIVA had about Big Tech Censorship in a FEDERAL LAWSUIT for WELL OVER TWO YEARS

The Plagiarism by Omidyar’s Intercept

The core of Dr. SHIVA’s Historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit, as stated upfront in the introduction is:

The plagiarist Fang tweets out without any attribution to Dr. SHIVA’s work, TWO YEARS LATER:

That “clearinghouse” – EISAC – is clearly defined front and center in our diagram and mentioned multiple times in the lawsuit. Moreover, the use of the third-party nonprofits to “fill in the gap” is the central thesis in our lawsuit, and Omidyar and DHS-funded Center for Internet Security (CIS) are right there as the clearinghouse for communications between government and social media companies. 

How did this so-called flunky Fang, a supposed “Investigative Reporter,” neither have the ability to use Google nor the ethics to attribute my work as the source? Is he that incompetent? Or did he not want to implicate his boss at the Intercept, Pierre Omidyar, as the one who funded that clearinghouse architecture?

Does this “investigative reporter” Fang not know how to use Google to find this:

Source: Influence Watch – https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/center-for-internet-security/

It clearly reports that since 2019, Omidyar has been funding, via his Democracy Fund, the Center for Internet Security (CIS) which IS that clearinghousewhich houses EISAC!

Again, are Fang and Klippenstein simply idiots?  I doubt it.  This was purposely doneto conceal the involvement of Pierre Omidyar, the funder and founder of the Intercept, who also was clearly working with the DHS, as they are the ones who funded millions for CIS.

It does not require an “investigative journalist” to see by a simple side-by-side comparison to our lawsuit, including the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram, the obvious plagiarism.

Plagiarism #1

This is the central concept – highlighted in yellow – that our lawsuit leads with and ends with, that the Intercept plagiarized:

Plagiarism #2

Our Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram, which was never referenced by the Intercept, includes Matt Masterson, a person quoted in their article. What the Intercept failed to mention, however, is that Matt Masterson also authored the Long Fuse Report, and was one of the authors of the EIO Playbooks. They conveniently gloss over Matt Masterson’s deep involvement by referring to him as “former DHS” official, when in reality, Masterson’s DHS ties to CISA, as well as EISAC and CIS –  all documented in our diagram – run deep.

Plagiarism #3

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which I discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit described this process in detail in 2020-2021. Instead of referencing our lawsuit, the Intercept cites their source as “DHS.” Interestingly, in the quote below from the Intercept, the authors are very general in their reference to “government officials,” and specific when mentioning certain social media platforms. Later on, it becomes clear that these authors are well-aware that the government officials include Secretaries of State, and that the social media platforms include many more than those specified here, especially Twitter, which they conveniently omitted. All of these details are included in our Diagram. You’d think if you were interviewing Matt Masterson, one of the architects of this infrastructure, you’d would know this! :

Plagiarism #4

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which I discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021. The Intercept just mentions Facebook, however our lawsuit showed that ALL social media platforms , and provided evidence on the record of how this very processes occurred step-by-step to Dr. SHIVA’s Twitter account. Again, no reference to Dr. Shiva’s Diagram, not even to Matt Masterson, whom the Intercept interviewed, about his authorship of the Long Fuse Report and collaboration on the Playbooks :

Plagiarism #5

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021. The Intercept cites “documents collected from a variety of sources,” but never names those “publicly available reports” nor references Dr. Shiva’s lawsuit:

Plagiarism #6

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021. Notice how the Intercept never names these “publicly available reports,” nor mentions that the DHS official, quoted earlier in their article, was one of the authors, nor that Matt Masterson is on Dr. Shiva’s Diagram, along with the specific names of the reports, purposely obscured by the Intercept:

Plagiarism #7

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021. Here, the Intercept credits NBC news as their source, and describes secretive meetings where unnamed “government officials” and tech companies plot together to handle election misinformation. This is one of the few instances where the Intercept names their source, and specifies the type of misinformation – election – yet they fail to reference Dr. Shiva’s lawsuit, and the Playbooks discovered by Dr. Shiva that outline the process. Instead, the Intercept conceals the real process and steals from Dr. Shiva’s work to confuse and obfuscate reality :

Plagiarism #8

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Long before anyone else, Dr. Shiva called out then-President Trump for signing CISA into law, and educated people on CISA’s role in the laundering of censorship by the Government

Plagiarism #9

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube:

Plagiarism #10

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which I discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts I did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube:

Plagiarism #11

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts I did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. The Intercept specifically mentions the 2020 election here, the exact time-frame when this apparatus, as they refer to it, was working to censor Dr. Shiva, and detailed extensively in Dr. Shiva’s lawsuit, videos and blogs during 2020-21. Failing to mention Dr. Shiva in this instance is deliberate:

Plagiarism #12

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts I did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also, did not the flunkies at the Intercept want to report – at least on an ethical basis for conflict of interest disclosure – that their boss Pierre Omidyar funded the Center fo Internet Security, and their boss’s funding when to develop that “process” for takedown requests leading up to November 2020, that was used against me?

Plagiarism #13

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts I did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube.

Plagiarism #14

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

Plagiarism #15

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

Plagiarism #16

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

Plagiarism #17

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts I did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

Plagiarism #18

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

Plagiarism #19

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

Plagiarism #20

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

Plagiarism #21

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

Plagiarism #22

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram  

Plagiarism #23

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

Plagiarism #24

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

Plagiarism #25

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

Plagiarism #26

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

Plagiarism #27

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram  

Plagiarism #28

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

Plagiarism #29

The Playbooks and the Long Fuse Report which Dr. SHIVA discovered that were read into the court record in our lawsuit describes this process in detail in 2020-2021, as well as the many videos and blog posts Dr. SHIVA did available on vashiva.com as well as youtube. Also noted on the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure Network Diagram 

By the way, the ethics guidelines for investigative journalism demands at minimum attribution of ideas from source material.  Not ONE SINGLE attribution to Dr.SHIVA’s content, which was accessible to anyone on this site for over two years.

Omidyar’s Intercept Blatant Prevarications & Manipulation

BIG LIE # 1

The Intercept states that the work is not known to the American public in the first highlighted portion.  This false.  Millions of those who viewed our videos, blogs, and witnessed the lawsuit in real time, were fully aware.  This is an absolute prevarication to rewrite history.  The truth is Intercept did know and made this statement  to bury the original source – our lawsuit

BIG LIE # 2

The Intercept is falsely rewriting history here in the second portion of the red highlights.  The Playbooks discovered by Dr. SHIVA in his lawsuit discovered were written in 2018, and other earlier documents put into the court record clearly identify  that DHS was involved . 

BIG LIE # 3

This is absolutely false on two levels: 1) Our entire lawsuit is precisely about this coordination, and the government admitted on the record that they are doing this in court testimony, and 2) as exposed in the Playbooks which were written in 2018 as discovered in Dr. SHIVA’s lawsuit.

BIG LIE # 4

This is absolutely false as exposed in the Playbooks discovered in Dr. SHIVA’s lawsuit, which were written in 2018.

BIG LIE # 5

This is absolutely false as exposed in the Playbooks discovered in Dr. SHIVA’s lawsuit, which were written in 2018.

BIG LIE # 6

This is absolutely false as exposed in the Playbooks discovered in Dr. SHIVA’s lawsuit which were written in 2018.  The effort began back in 2018!

BIG LIE # 7

This is absolutely false. My lawsuit and the materials Dr. SHIVA discovered revealed CISA’s goal.

BIG LIE # 8

This is omission of facts as detailed in the Playbooks. Elections were and are a central part of this censorship effort.

BIG LIE # 9

This is omission of facts as detailed in the Playbooks. Elections were and still are a central part of this censorship effort.

BIG LIE # 10

This is omission of facts as detailed in the Playbooks. Elections were and still are a central part of this censorship effort.

BIG LIE # 11

This is omission of facts as detailed in the Playbooks. Elections were and still are a central part of this censorship effort.

BIG LIE # 12

This is omission of facts as detailed in the Playbooks. Elections were and still are a central part of this censorship effort.

BIG LIE # 13

This is omission of facts as detailed in the Playbooks. Elections were and still are a central part of this censorship effort.

BIG LIE # 14

This is omission of facts as detailed in the Playbooks. Elections were and still are a central part of this censorship effort.

BIG LIE # 15

This is omission of facts as detailed in the Playbooks. Elections were and still are a central part of this censorship effort.

BIG LIE # 16

This is omission of facts as detailed in the playbooks. Elections were a central part of this censorship effort.

BIG LIE # 17

This is omission of facts as detailed in the Playbooks. Elections were and still are a central part of this censorship effort.

BIG LIE # 18

This is omission of facts as detailed in the Playbooks. Elections were and still are a central part of this censorship effort.

BIG LIE # 19

ABSOLUTE LIE. They diminish the role of the censorship on Twitter, and this is at the heart of their efforts to bury the findings of our lawsuit. I had 400,000 followers on Twitter and massive engagement.

Omidyar’s Intercept Intentional Misattribution of Dr. SHIVA’s Work In Order to Not Giving Credit to His Discovery

Misattribution #1

Misattribution #2

Misattribution #3

Misattribution #4

Misattribution #4

Misattribution #5

The Logical Conclusion is that Intercept and their Colleagues – ACLU, Tucker Carlson and Glenn Greenwald Who Actively Concealed Dr. Shiva’s Historic 2020 Lawsuit – are an Extension of Omidyar’s Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure!  They Serve Omidyar. They Serve the Censorship Infrastructure.  This is WHY They Concealed and Censored Dr. SHIVA While Amplifying the Intercept’s “DHS Leaks”

The A.C.L.U. Concealed Dr. SHIVA’s work but AMPLIFIED the Intercept’s “DHS Leaks” Dribble.

Tucker Carlson Concealed Dr. SHIVA’s work but AMPLIFIED the Intercept’s “DHS Leaks” Dribble.

Here Tucker Carlson acts like Mickey the Dunce and Amplifies the Intercept’s Story acting like he never knew abou the Censorship Architecture.

Further active concealment of our lawsuit is noted in Tucker Carlson’s blatant mis-crediting the flunky Fang’s plagiarism when Carlson states, by stating “I’m so grateful that you did.  It’s a great story.  It’s a huge public service, I hope you’re rewarded for it. I doubt you will be, but you should be.”

And, Greenwald amplified the Intercept’s Story, knowing full well of ours over two years before.

Our Lawsuit Then and EVEN NOW Exposes How the Government Silences REAL JOURNALISTS, REAL POLITICAL ACTIVISTS Like Dr. SHIVA and HIs Colleagues – Outsiders of the System – The Role of Government is Ubiquitous in the Events Leading to, During, and Currently Ongoing Concerning Our Historic 2020 Lawsuit That Exposed the Government & Big Tech Censorship Architecture

It was the government of Massachusetts that was involved in malfeasance during my 2020 run for U.S. Senate in the Republican Primary. 

It was government – the Secretary State of Massachusetts – which deleted over 1 million ballot images I sought to audit my own 2020 U.S. Republican Primary election. 

It was the government that contacted Twitter using the Portal I discovered to deplatform me from Twitter.

It was government when it became afraid of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure that the lawsuit revealed and attempted to settle with me by asking me to drop all claims against the government and be happy to just get back on Twitter (the one claim).

It was government, when I refused, threatened me with fines and Rule 11 sanctions for not willing to drop the claims.

It was government that SEALED my Amended Complaint.

It was government that then forced me to file an Amended complaint with just one claim to get back on Twitter, which I did, and included all the findings – fortunately.

It was government, now, that is using its proxy the Intercept, an organization founded and fund by Pierre Omidyar that is attempting to do a Limited Hangout to squash the real story that the same man who funded and created the censorship network is the same man who directs the media company that seeks to take credit for my work while leaving out its essence.

Pierre Omidyar’s Intercept Acted Unethically and Violated Basic Journalistic Standards

Here are the standards they broke: https://ethics.journalists.org/topics/plagiarism-and-attribution/

THE BIG PROBLEM FOR THE INTERCEPT: The MOVEMENT for Truth Freedom Health® Exists

In spite of all efforts of the government – including its proxy the Intercept – to do its actions, we are succeeding, because, unlike earlier efforts, which ended in martyrdom or being squashed, this lawsuit lives on, because of the movement for Truth Freedom Health®.

It was this movement and our independent journalism, presence on multiple social media, and use of our own servers and media, that allowed us to publish blogs, videos, posts, and work with other independent journalists to reach over 200 million people worldwide.

Earlier this kind of Limited Hangout would have succeeded. But not this time.  We will expose the Intercept and its enablers such as Tucker Carlson, Glenn Greenwald, the ACLU, and Internet Grifters for their involvement in enabling this deception.

It’s time that Truth is not blunted by this technique of Limited Hangout.

CONCLUSION

The Government and Big Tech Infrastructure was revealed in our lawsuit in 2020, TWO Years ago, which was seen by over 200 million people across the world. Now, based on how the mainstream media and government actors reacted, our lawsuit provides another dimension: how the media works with government to suppress, manipulate, deceive and dribble the real findings to conceal the players involved in it, when they believe that their initial suppression has failed i.e. a “Limited Hangout”

In our work, because of our movement for Truth Freedom Health®,  we exposed through thousands of pages of documents, source material such as the Playbooks, our own lawsuit’s transcripts and testimonies, the Long Fuse Report, the entire Government and Big Tech Censorship infrastructure.

Now, for the mainstream media and grifters to make our work invisible is clear evidence of the government and its actors purposefully involved in concealing our work. 

But they have a big problem, over 200 million people worldwide, saw our blogs, our videos, coverage by other REAL investigative journalists and bloggers. The only people that appear to “not know” about this are the likes of the Intercept, Tucker Carlson, the ACLU, Glenn Greenwald, and Internet Grifters, who did know and CONCEALED IT.  This is the Truth. 

These folks are government actors – fully aware of the “limited hangout” concept.

They know that Pierre Omidyar is an actor for Intelligence community – one simply needs to do a some basic Google searches .

Omidyar is fully aware of Intelligence agency techniques.  In their insidious process, the original real investigative journalists are branded by these government-funded forces as “conspiracy theorists,” de-platformed, and made invisible, while media engines – like the Intercept – are projected as “investigative journalists” remain on Twitter and social media platforms – and are NEVER deplatformed.  

Their process involves doing Limited Hangouts, and enabling that concealment using high profile news personalities such as Tucker Carlson, Glenn Greenwald and internet grifters who spread pale version of the WHOLE TRUTH under the moniker of “breaking” and “shocking” news.

They use these same MSM media and not-so-obvious-establishment media personalities to CONCEAL the real truth.

They spread LIES, LIES, LIES as seen in what the Intercept did under the brand of “fearless” investigative journalists.while sidelining the real journalists as “conspiracy theorists.” Blatant concealment goes hand in hand with plagiarizing and hijacking source and original content, and then purposefully misattributing it to bury the original work – a classic technique – that we now know is the LIMITED HANGOUT! 

---

Last updated: July 2021

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai’s Lawsuit: Ayyadurai v. Twitter, Et Al.

This is the first lawsuit to expose how the government censors U.S. citizens’ speech on Twitter. For years we were told Twitter acts on its own as a private company and you cannot question their decisions. Following the deplatforming of Dr.SHIVA, testimony and hearings in Federal court elicited how the government and Twitter have created an infrastructure for government to launder censorship of speech through Twitter. This website provides all documents as they emerge in this historic lawsuit. The presiding Federal Judge declared this case is one of the substantial constitutional consequences and a lawsuit that will likely become “a law school exam in Constitutional Law.”

Dr.SHIVA is representing himself against BIG LAW and BIG TECH. It’s truly a David and Goliath story. We the people versus the elite who never liked the First Amendment.

UPDATE FROM OUR LAST HEARING

Six out of seven claims in our lawsuit were dismissed. Given our lawsuit was about preserving and protecting the First Amendment, we chose not to pursue this one remaining claim that would, at best,  put us back on Twitter, which was never our end goal.

The court papers, brief, complaints, transcripts are located below for your transparent review and access.

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM REGARDING
ELECTIONS INTERFERENCE OPERATIONS PLAYBOOK

On July 22, 2021, Dr.SHIVA, per Order from the Court, filed the Revised Second Amended Complaint, which includes the latest discovery of the domestic censorship infrastructure – a 24/7 speech surveillance SYSTEM to surveil, blacklist, and silence Americans – created by the RICO Defendants with Twitter, Harvard’s Belfer Center, Department of Homeland Security’s CISA, and billionaires Pierre Omidyar and Mark Zuckerberg, to name a few. click this link to go direct to the PDF. Below are links to The Long Fuse Report, Exhibit A (on-line and high-res versions) of the Domestic Censorship Enterprise, Exhibit B, Exhibit C.

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM REGARDING
ELECTIONS INTERFERENCE OPERATIONS PLAYBOOK

On May 21, 2021, Dr.SHIVA filed a Supplemental Memorandum regarding the Elections Interference Operations Playbook for State and Local Officials that established the Infrastructure, Processes, and Protocols for surveillance and reporting of “threats” via the Twitter Trusted Partnership and Twitter Partner Support (PSP) Portal. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM REGARDING
QUALIFIED IMMUNITY FOR THE COMMONWEALTH DEFENDANTS

On May 21, 2021, Dr.SHIVA filed a Supplemental Memorandum regarding the Qualified Immunity for the Commonwealth Defendants. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF STACIA CARDILLE

On May 19, 2021, a Supplemental Declaration was filed by Stacia Cardille. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION REGARDING
THE CARDILLE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY TWITTER

On May 19, 2021, Dr.SHIVA filed a Supplemental Declaration regarding the Cardille Affidavit filed by Twitter. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

DECLARATION OF STACIA CARDILLE

On May 14, 2021, a Declaration was filed by Stacia Cardille. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

DECLARATION OF MICHAEL ANDERSON IN SUPPORT OF TWITTER’S
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JOINDER

On May 14, 2021, a Submission was filed by Proposed Defendant, Twitter, Inc. regarding the May 20, 2021 Hearing on Pending Motions. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

SUBMISSION OF TWITTER REGARDING MAY, 20, 2021
HEARING ON PENDING MOTIONS

On May 14, 2021, a Submission was filed by Proposed Defendant, Twitter, Inc. regarding the May 20, 2021 Hearing on Pending Motions. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

PRESS RELEASE – FIRST CASE TO SHOW HOW GOVERNMENT MAKES
TWITTER SILENCE POLITICAL SPEECH

Federal Judge Mark Wolf orders Twitter to testify at landmark Hearing. Public can Zoom in. Judge’s Additional Order seeks experts to weigh in on historic First Amendment case. View the Press Release using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

FEDERAL JUDGE’S ADDITIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FOR HEARING ON MAY 20, 2021 WITH PARTICIPATION BY AMICI CURIAE

On May 13, 2021 (see below), the Federal Judge issued an Additional Memorandum and Order for a hearing to be scheduled on May 20, 2021 with participation by Amici Curiae. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

FEDERAL JUDGE’S MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FOR HEARING ON MAY 20, 2021

On May 10, 2021 (see below), the Federal Judge issued a Memorandum and Order for a hearing to be scheduled on May 20, 2021. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT EXPOSING
TWITTER AS AN AGENT OF THE GOVERNMENT

On April 6, 2021 (see below), Dr.SHIVA filed his Second Amended Complaint including Twitter as Defendant. This is the first lawsuit in the world exposing Twitter as an agent of the Government. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

JUDGE’S ORDER TO INCLUDE
TWITTER AS DEFENDANT

On March 25, 2021 (see below), Judge Mark Wolf issued an Order asking Dr.SHIVA to file his Second Amended Complaint including Twitter as Defendant. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

MOTION FOR JOINDER AND LEAVE TO FILE
THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

On February 25, 2021 (see below), Dr.SHIVA filed a Motion for Joinder and Leave to file the Second Amended Complaint. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR JOINDER
AND LEAVE TO FILE THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

On February 25, 2021 (see below), Dr.SHIVA also filed a Memorandum in support of Motion for Joinder and Leave to file the Second Amended Complaint. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ISSUED BY FEDERAL JUDGE
TO WILLIAM GALVIN

On February 19, 2021 (see below), the Federal Judge issued a Memorandum and Order directing William Galvin to file an Affidavit and Memorandum adding Twitter as a defendant. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

EMERGENCY HEARING TO OBTAIN ORDER

On February 4, 2021 (see below), Dr.SHIVA filed an Emergency Motion to obtain an Order to withdraw the keyword “TASSINARI” from Twitter’s algorithm as it intended to silence Dr.SHIVA’s speech. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

AFFIDAVIT OF DR.SHIVA ON EMERGENCY HEARING ORDER

On February 4, 2021 (see below), Dr.SHIVA filed an Affidavit in support of an Emergency Hearing and Order. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

MOTION TO VACATE STAY OF DISCOVERY AND ISSUE SUBPOENA

On February 4, 2021 (see below), Dr.SHIVA filed a Motion to vacate Stay Order and Issue a Subpoena. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS NASED AND AMY COHEN

On January 21, 2021 (see below), Dr.SHIVA filed his Opposition to the Motion to dismiss NASED and Amy Cohen from the hearing. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMY COHEN

On January 21, 2021 (see below), Dr.SHIVA filed his Opposition to the Motion to dismiss Amy Cohen from the hearing. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS WILLIAM GALVIN

On December 15, 2020 (see below), Dr.SHIVA filed his Opposition to the Motion to dismiss Massachusetts Secretary of State, William Galvin from the hearing. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY DR.SHIVA

On November 6, 2020 (see below), Dr.SHIVA filed his Amended Complaint against Massachusetts Secretary of State, William Galvin. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

ORDER ISSUED BY JUDGE MARK WOLF

Judge Mark L. Wolf of the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts issued an Order at 3:30PM on October 30, 2020 declaring Massachusetts Secretary of State William F. Galvin:

1. “[S]hall not… report or complain to Twitter concerning any tweets from plaintiff Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai;”
2. “[S]hall ask the National Association of State Election Directors not to report or complain to Twitter concerning any tweets by plaintiff;” and,
3. “If defendant [Secretary of State Galvin] believes that any tweet or communication by plaintiff is false or misleading, he [Secretary Galvin] may say so in a tweet or in any other manner.”

You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.

INITIAL COMPLAINT FILED BY DR.SHIVA

On October 20, 2020, Dr.SHIVA filed his Initial Complaint against Massachusetts Secretary of State, William Galvin. You can view it using the browser below or click this link to go direct to the PDF.