Become a Truth Freedom Health® Warrior-Scholar
Attend Truth Freedom Health® Thursday Open House
ROUGH TRANSCRIPT (Auto-Generated)
Hello, this is Dr. Shiva, and I’m running for president the presentation I’m going to give you as a very objective one, we need to recognize that many people were supporting the Paris Accords, if you ask them, Why should we have been in this give me one benefit, no one can really give any benefit. In fact, I haven’t had anyone rationally explain even one benefit.
But I’m going to explain to you very quickly here, so everyone can understand in very simple ways is why it was essentially going to support an international collusion to basically support the polluting of our environment, and more importantly, to basically tax ALL OF US businesses, small businesses, big businesses, primarily a lot of small businesses, and every consumer here with a carbon tax. And it’s a very simple exposition of this. And I hope I make it clear to you, first of all, let me explain something very basic here.
So in this circle, let’s consider the fact that we have a lot of businesses here, these are businesses throughout the world. And these businesses, you know, are producing different things. And let’s assume these are typically manufacturing businesses, you know, they take resources, raw materials, they process stuff, and outcomes, products,
from these businesses, which typically go to the consumer, you know, the lot of consumers here, this is, you know, you and me over here, and we buy these products, and we pay this company, some dollar amount. Now, many of these companies, because of the manufacturing process, do put out carbon and co2 into the environment, let’s call that broadly, you know, pollution, okay? Pollution, the term of co2. All right.
So these are these greenhouse gases that they emit into the atmosphere. This is, let’s call it before the Paris Accords. This is what’s taking place. Again, businesses take resources, they create products, we buy them, and we pay some fee for them. And these business have been polluting. Now Has anything changed post the Paris Accords. And let’s use the day 2030, as this is supposed to be an important date for the Paris Accords.
So what happens here, here, again, I’m going to draw the same circle, we have the businesses, and let’s put the year now 2030. And what occurs in 2030, these businesses still exist, let’s say, again, these are the businesses.
And they are creating products, as I mentioned before, to us as consumers, same situation. This is again, you and me.
And these consumers pay some fee for these products. And guess what, they’re still polluting. And I’ll tell you some numbers on this. In fact, they’re polluting a lot more, as we’ll see. But something very interesting happens for the pollution they do, they have to now pay an organization, which I’m going to call in double quotes, the IP CC.
And this group is composed of people like Al Gore, you know, people like the bushes.
You know, many people from the commodities market, and essentially a global elite in here, quote, unquote, scientists $1 goes here, dollars go in, and these people deliver these people something called carbon credits.
And what this allows these companies to do now is to pollute, but in order to pollute, they have to pay this organization, a fee, and this organization issues carbon credits. In fact, it gets even more interesting, these carbon credits, if you look at the commodities market, the global commodities market
market are these carbon credits are bought and sold here on this commodities market to people. And this generates the ability for this group to generate trillions, not billions, let me explain trillions of dollars in new source of wealth. So these carbon credits were created by this group, as a vehicle to essentially charge polluters something and this group has a potential make trillions and trillions of dollars. So how did this all happen?
And what was the Paris Accords? Well, the front end for this entire organization, by the way, Al Gore, substantially, at a certain point, monopolize had access to a large number of carbon credits, which he had accumulated. And his goal was to have a pay day by forcing these businesses in the future around 20, post 2030 to buy these carbon credits. And if you actually look at this, the IPCs PR, I call it their PR machine, was what we call the Paris Accords. The Paris Accords was really their PR engine to get this out as though everyone needed to get on board. And what the US if you look at the United States
Next here, you know, the flag here the US was being forced, by the ice IPCC. By the way, this included Democratic establishment Democrats and establishment Republicans, who were essentially telling the US government that it needed to create what we call a Green Fund. And this Green Fund, and I’ll explain what this was really about, the US was going to have to put 100 billion into this Green Fund. And what was this 100 billion for? Well, remember, the countries who are polluting really didn’t want to be part of this, they didn’t really want to be part of the Paris Accords.
Why? Because they have to pay fees to the IPCC. So how do you get them to be part of this? So if I do this over here, what I call the influencers of these countries, influencers of countries. So for example, if you take India, you know, China, and you go down the list of what they call about 190 plus countries, remember, all these people have influencers, you know, so called advisors, this 100 billion dollar number was going to be funneled through different NGOs to essentially pay off.
And in fact, people have already gotten agreements, that if they joined the Paris Accords, that they’re going to get dollars funneled to them. This is why people were involved in so that in fact, some of the WikiLeaks stuff came out. J rom Ramesh, one of the key advisors in India, originally, if you go look at it, he said that the glaciers were not receding. And later on, it was stated that the glaciers were receding, and in a recent email, and WikiLeaks, he was actually thanking John Podesta, for making all of this occur.
So you have to really start thinking about what took place. But what was really going on is this, the mafia of the IPCC was using the United States instrument, our Congress, our tax dollars, to funnel about 100 billion here. So we would pay off these people to join the Paris Accords. Now, let me just tell you 100 billion is relatively small amount, because these guys were going to make trillions. So let me let me follow this through again. So you got it. Businesses today are polluting. Just to give you an example, China today, pollutes around 11 billion tons of carbon into the atmosphere in carbon love and billion tons of carbon. That’s what they’re doing today.
By 2030, do between now and 2030, guess what China’s still allowed to pollute, in fact, China is allowed to go up to 22 billion tonnes, which means they’re allowed to go 11 billion tonnes and carbon, which means you’re gonna pollute more, they’re gonna double their pollution during this period, no penalties. And that’s how they got China to join.
After 2030 There’s gonna be a big payday for these guys, because they’re gonna be able to sell China carbon credit, I hope everyone’s following. The bottom line is the set 190 In many ways, so called influencers and advisors, many of them essentially, are waiting for this 100 billion dollar payday supported the Paris Accords, because they’re going to be paid. And that’s how they forced their countries advise a country’s prime ministers and people to say, Yeah, we got to join this Paris Accords.
The reality is, when you step back and look at this diagram, who really profits is liberal bourgeois, we’re going to make money on carbon credits that they fluctuate and rapidly grow in price post 2030. So $100 billion payout to most of these corrupt officials, it’s very well worth it for them, because they’re going to have 1,000% 102,000% increase in profits.
And fundamentally, what this does is makes liberal bourgeois feel good that they’re part of the Paris Accords. In fact, the MIT President has said, you know, we have conclusive evidence that temperature has gone up, let me just make it very clear.
That Hanson, the guy who came up with his temperature rating at NASA, you know, during the 1950s to 1990, they use what they said was the average temperature 1998 During that period, that’s how they measure the average temperature. And they said the average temperature was 15 degrees Celsius. And they predicted in 1990, around 1988, that temperature was going to go up.
So again, in 1988, papers are starting to come out, saying the average temperature measure between 1950 to 1980 is 15 degrees, and they’re saying, you know, temperature is going to rise on the planet Earth.
Well, what happens by 1995 1996? They find out the temperature actually, in fact, gone down a little bit. It was not going up, and somehow mysteriously around 2002. Hansen says, yes, the temperature has gone up. And how did he get it to go up? He got it to go up by saying that the average temperature is now 14 degrees. He actually changed the goalposts before it’s 15. He said, Now it’s 14 and he said we’re done.
Measuring 14.64. So what they did was a complete lie. And in fact, this changing of the goalposts was done in an email all of this is written in a beautiful article by Arvind Kumar, in American thinker called 14 is a new 15 or 14 is a new 15. Exactly, so should go read it by Arvind Kumar and American thinker. He lays it out very beautifully.
But the bottom line is, there is no conclusive evidence that the temperature has gone up. If you look at the facts there, this entire process really profits this group, the realities, China’s going to continue to pollute 2x 200% More, India also gets to pollute from 2 billion to 4 billion. In fact, we’re going to drop our carbon emissions from 5 billion to 4 billion. So this entire process is really a big racket.
So all of us when I go back to this a consumer, guess what, in the future, we’re actually going to pay more for products, businesses are going to be charged more so businesses are paying taxes, each consumers product is going to go up. These guys up here are the ones who are going to make money. So we need to start really exposing the mainstream media and the elite academics. We’re all actually behind this. Thank you
